🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to remove African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.