🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable small “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty captive marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated controversy over their destiny often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in confinement, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the embattled amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the authorities covers the upkeep of keeping them alive. Canada’s fisheries minister has refused that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Experts say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are deeply intelligent mammals – something one caretaker observed directly.

Burgess spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a job that involved building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those relationships over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the subtleties and quirks in their dispositions. She cultivated a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with different temperaments.

“One whale selected me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Both transformed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a background of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility ascribes to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say reflects the substandard environment in which they were maintained.

The facility did not operate to the guests over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the pools because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The park did not comment to a questionnaire, but in the past claimed: “The whales … receive far higher quality medical attention and constant attention than any person in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was terminated from the park in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the caretakers had to put down. She said the facility thought information of the incident were leaked to the media and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any attempts to euthanize even a single beluga would require “considerable staff”, trucks and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs requests for the whales to be transferred immediately from the park, with its crumbling tanks and reduced personnel.

In recent months, Canada’s government official denied a request to send the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a perpetual existence in confinement and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an transfer that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s comments indicate a more general misunderstanding of the realities of life for belugas born in captivity.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities struggle to find a resolution, ideas have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of food for Indigenous peoples.

A planned refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The prospective facility, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a sustainable answer for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an experiment” in the whales’ future.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a workable solution in the near future.

An official, leader of the sanctuary project, said the location will replicate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|